Turn the supplied raw experiment evidence into a genuinely excellent WhichBuildWon case-study page.

The person opening the page should be able to understand within roughly 10 seconds:

1. what question was tested
2. what Claude actually built
3. what Codex actually built
4. the most meaningful differences between the results
5. what the experiment suggests, with appropriate scope

Use only evidence recorded in the supplied experiment. Never invent facts, explanations, motivations, test results, or missing data.

The actual builds and screenshots are primary evidence and should be treated as such.

Make the page useful and interesting to a human deciding how to use AI coding agents.

You have discretion over hierarchy, composition, presentation, copy, evidence selection, comparison treatment, and page-specific visual design.

Preserve the site's global identity and navigation, but you may substantially redesign this case-study page.

Deterministic checks and scores are supporting evidence. Decide how prominently they deserve to appear based on what is actually useful to the reader.

Do not modify unrelated routes or experiment evidence.

Do not add external facts or perform web research.

Build the page, ensure it works at desktop and mobile widths, run the appropriate existing checks, and stop after this implementation pass.